Traditional instruction tends to focus on covering content at surface levels, requiring students to memorize information and complete lower rigor tasks—for example, worksheets or repetitive practice problems. In these classrooms, the teacher’s voice dominates, and students participate in ritualistic compliance with little voice or choice in their learning process.
This traditional approach often leads to:
- Overreliance on teacher support: The teacher visibly works too hard, with students dependent upon the teacher to prompt them throughout the lesson.
- Low student ownership: There is little release of the learning process to students.
- Superficial discourse: If there is a discussion about the content, it is usually brief, or the teacher is heavily facilitating and prompting the discussion.
Today’s students, especially post-pandemic, are easily bored and may exhibit greater disruptive behaviors in traditional classroom learning environments that simply no longer engage them. When students submit to ritualistic compliance (or disruptive behavior), learning gaps form and widen, especially for students without strong academic support from home.
These daily lesson-level learning gaps grow over time into achievement gaps on state tests and national assessments. The National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) recently revealed historic achievement gaps that are widening in today’s classrooms.